The short renewal rule Do not renew a GEO agency from a dashboard score or a handful of screenshots. Match the signed scope to accepted work; inspect complete raw observations, method drift, implementation and rework; confirm buyer ownership and handover; then judge commercial fit. A placement guarantee, withheld buyer-owned evidence, or missing export should stop automatic renewal—not automatically prove breach.

Quoted First sells AI visibility services and is not independent of this buying category. Apply the same checklist to us. This page organizes supplied evidence; it does not verify claims, interpret contract language, or make a legal or business decision.

Before the notice deadline

Review eight records, not one headline metric.

A provider can deliver disciplined work while an answer engine changes, or report a lift without delivering the work you bought. Keep controllable delivery, observation quality, and external outcomes separate.

Review areaEvidence to reconcileRenewal questionGate
1. Scope and accepted deliverySigned scope, amendments, due dates, acceptance, late work, exclusions, and unresolved rework.What was promised, delivered, accepted, disputed, or never due?Standard
2. Raw observations and methodologyFrozen questions, complete answers, URLs, timestamps, nulls, failures, denominators, platform conditions, and exports.Can the buyer reconstruct every reported result?Critical
3. Measurement consistencyMethod versions, approved changes, repeat design, variability, baseline resets, and uncertainty language.Were pre/post periods comparable, or was the ruler changed?Standard
4. Implemented work and reworkPublished URLs, source files, change log, approvals, QA, owner, acceptance criteria, and open defects.Did recommendations become accepted work the buyer can retain?Critical
5. Access, ownership, and handoverAccounts, domains, analytics, repositories, content, prompts, raw data, licenses, exports, deletion, and offboarding plan.Can the buyer operate and audit the work without the provider?Critical
6. Commercial terms and total costFees, pass-through costs, unused scope, change orders, renewal term, notice, price changes, credits, and dependencies.Is the next term worth its complete cost and opportunity cost?Standard
7. Integrity and controllable commitmentsNo-guarantee language, claim support, negative results, attribution limits, disclosure, and ethical source practices.Did the provider promise process and delivery rather than external placement?Critical
8. Forward plan and decision conditionsNext-term hypothesis, exact deliverables, owners, milestones, acceptance, dependencies, stop rules, and handover fallback.Would renewal buy a testable plan rather than indefinite activity?Standard
VerifiedDated artifact inspected and consistent with the claim.
Partly evidencedSome support exists, but scope, period, or completeness is unresolved.
Not evidencedNo inspectable support was supplied for the review period.
Not applicableOnly for a standard area; explain why the contract excludes it.
Browser-local review

Build the renewal evidence memo.

Enter only what you can support. Blanks remain explicit; critical areas must be verified before the output can say the record is ready for a human renewal decision.

No upload · no account

Existing agency engagement review

The posture is a rules-based evidence triage, not a provider score, legal conclusion, breach finding, or recommendation.

01 · Engagement and deadline

Identify the contract under review

Copy from the executed contract; this tool does not calculate it.
02 · Delivery reconciliation

Match promised work to acceptance evidence

Use one row per material deliverable. Blank rows are ignored; populated rows with no status remain unresolved.

Contracted deliverableDue or cadenceAcceptance statusEvidence reference
03 · Evidence matrix

Mark what you inspected—not what was asserted

Critical areas are deliberately not scoreable or dismissible as not applicable. Anything short of verified remains a critical blocker to automatic renewal.

1. Scope and accepted delivery

Standard

2. Raw observations and methodology

Critical gate

3. Measurement consistency

Standard

4. Implemented work and rework

Critical gate

5. Access, ownership, and handover

Critical gate

6. Commercial terms and total cost

Standard

7. Integrity and controllable commitments

Critical gate

8. Forward plan and decision conditions

Standard
04 · Observed stop conditions

Flag only a condition you can document

A checked box stops automatic renewal in the generated posture. It does not prove breach, fraud, damages, or a required termination.

05 · Human decision context

Write the conditions before discussing the outcome

Generate · evidence posture, not verdict

The memo preserves every review status, critical blocker, flagged condition, deliverable issue, and supplied deadline. It never converts them into a numerical provider score.

Start with the executed contract and notice deadline. Empty fields and unreviewed gates stay visible in the memo.

Interpretation boundary

What the three evidence postures mean.

Stop automatic renewal

At least one critical area is not verified or a documented stop condition is flagged. Preserve the notice deadline, require a written cure or condition, and prepare an orderly handover option before the authorized humans decide. This posture does not itself mean terminate, breach, or provider misconduct.

Renegotiation-ready

Critical controls are verified, but delivery, commercial, or forward-plan gaps remain. Convert each gap into explicit scope, evidence, owner, acceptance, deadline, price, credit, or exit language before renewing.

Ready for a human renewal decision

The supplied record has no unresolved critical gate, checked stop condition, or open delivery issue. It still does not show that renewal is economically wise, legally required, causally responsible for an outcome, or preferable to internal work, software, another provider, or stopping.

Keep outcome evidence in its laneA linked citation, mention, recommendation, sentiment, traffic, pipeline, revenue, accepted deliverable, and contract obligation are different facts. A decline in one external observation is not automatically poor delivery; a rise is not automatically proof of the agency’s causal impact.

Frequently asked questions

Should I renew my GEO agency contract?

Do not decide from a visibility score alone. Reconcile signed scope and acceptance, inspect raw observations and method changes, verify implemented work and buyer ownership, compare complete cost with the next-term plan, and write unresolved conditions before the notice deadline. Business, risk, contract, and budget owners make the final decision.

What evidence should an AI visibility agency provide at renewal?

Ask for the contract and amendments, deliverable and acceptance register, complete raw responses including nulls and failures, frozen question and method versions, implemented-file inventory, access and ownership register, invoices and pass-through costs, open rework, renewal offer, and handover export.

Does lower AI visibility mean the agency breached its contract?

Not by itself. Answer engines, retrieval, source pools, model routing, and outputs change. Compare the actual contract, observation conditions, evidence quality, controllable commitments, and accepted work. Contract interpretation belongs with qualified reviewers.

Can an agency guarantee AI citations?

No provider controls an external answer engine’s source selection. A contract may guarantee process, cadence, deliverables, response time, evidence access, or acceptance standards; it should not guarantee a mention, citation, link, recommendation, rank, traffic, pipeline, or revenue result controlled by others.

Does the renewal review upload or store contract information?

No. The form, memo, copy action, and Markdown download run in the browser. The page does not upload or store entered text. Your browser, device, extensions, and downstream handling remain outside this page’s control.

Preserve the evidence before the notice deadline.

Make the provider, buyer, procurement, and contract reviewers discuss the same deliverables, gaps, access, cost, and handover record.